Numerical Analysis Questions & Answers | |
|
|
|
|
Better. 0.5 point extra bonus. If you would have typeset this with proper LATEX equation numbers you would gotten more.
|
|
|
|
This is great. I'll give you 3 points bonus. It could be made a bit shorter thus, and you shouldn't separate the proof into sections: this makes it harder to read. Also, I was looking for a simpler proof using Taylor series. If someone else can do it, another 3 bonus points are up for grabs.
|
|
|
|
This is fine, I'll give you 2 points bonus. I would have given 3 if you would have typeset correctly your equations with proper equation numbers as specified in the LATEX mini HOWTO in the Skylounge. But, this proof is still not what I was looking for.. There's a much easier way to prove it using Taylor series (without power series). Three bonus points are still up for grabs.
|
|
|
|
This is what I was looking for. I'll give you 2.5 points bonus. The only problem here is that you don't define $f(x)$ prior to doing the expansion with the Taylor series.
|
|
|
|
Well, in this case, it's clear what the notation means. It doesn't matter if it's a superscript or subscript..
|
|
||
$\pi$ |