Fundamentals of Fluid Mechanics B Questions and Answers | |
|
|
The midterm is open book so you can consult your assignments, class notes, books if you want. However, if I were you, I would stick to consulting the tables: you won't waste time and score higher this way.
|
|
|
|
I don't understand where your equation (2) is coming from. You need to clarify this.
|
|
|
|
The equation in the tables is correct: there is no typo.
|
|
|
|
If it's given in the question don't derive it.
|
|
|
|
Use the one in the tables, don't derive it.
|
|
|
|
You could do this as a first approximation but you should ultimately integrate fully the equations starting from rest till terminal velocity. And typeset properly your comments/questions using LATEX please.
|
|
|
|
You can obtain a reference on your own using a simplified solution assuming no acceleration. When setting the height to a large value, both solutions (simplified and complete) will give the same answer for the time.
|
|
|
|
No, you should solve for the Oseen equation fully. This will give a different solution than the Stokes solution and you need to determine this difference. Also, you should write you code or analytical expression in general form so it can be applied to any droplet size, not just those listed in the question.
|
|
|
|
I think this assignment is significantly easier than the previous one, and can be completed in 4 days. The deadline is not changed. Besides, the 3 questions were already mentioned to you in class more than 1 week ahead of the deadline. You had plenty of time to work on them.
|
|
This thread is for questions related to solving the assignment not to try to delay the due date.
|
|
|
|
If you can calculate form drag plus skin friction drag accurately then do so. Otherwise provide best estimate.
|
|
|
|
You can not make extra assumptions on top of those involved in deriving the boundary layer equations.
|
|
|
|
It's because far away from the cylinder, $u_w$ will be almost exactly equal to $u_\infty$ everywhere within the profile. As $x \rightarrow \infty$, $u_w \rightarrow u_\infty$. Thus, the point $u_w=0.999999 u_\infty$ won't lie anywhere on the profile! The way you determine the height must work equally well close to the cylinder and when $x$ is very large. Think about this more.
|
|
||
$\pi$ |